*BSD News Article 43869


Return to BSD News archive

Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.uwa.edu.au!classic.iinet.com.au!news.uoknor.edu!ns1.nodak.edu!netnews.nwnet.net!news.u.washington.edu!spleen.apl.washington.edu!user
From: kargl@apl.washington.edu (Steven G. Kargl)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: 3C509
Date: Mon, 08 May 1995 10:49:12 -0700
Organization: Applied Physics Lab/University of Washington
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <kargl-0805951049120001@spleen.apl.washington.edu>
References: <3ok6fm$l1h@news.nde.state.ne.us>
NNTP-Posting-Host: nntp5.u.washington.edu

In article <3ok6fm$l1h@news.nde.state.ne.us>, cwelch@esu3.esu3.k12.ne.us
(Craig L Welch) wrote:

> The FreeBSD.FAQ lists the 3C509 card with a (*), which later shows to 
> correspond to it having "known problems"  What, exactly, are these 
> problems?  Have they been resolved in any of the snapshots, will they be 
> in 2.0.5?  I've found the 3C509 to be an excelland busmastering card in 
> many other applications, use it now, and would rather not have to 
> purchase another type of card in order to use FreeBSD  :-)  I saw another 
> article about this on this newsgroup, but there was no reply.  One would 
> be greately appreciated, with an explanation of the problem/ solution /  
> and even a time-frame.  Are there / is there a way to recompile the 
> kernel to enable such support, and is it fully reliable / does it perform 
> correctly if this is done?  Thank you,
> 

The 3c509 works fine (once you get it set up).  The FAQ is quite out-of-date
IMHO wrt to the 3c509.  I have run a 3c509 under FreeBSD 1.1.5.1, 2.0R,
2 different SNAPS, and now current.  The driver (ep0) has undergone some
extensive work (some time arounf the 950412 SNAP), and appears to quite
stable.

-- 
Steven G. Kargl
Applied Physics Laboratory
University of Washington
Seattle, WA 98105