*BSD News Article 44123


Return to BSD News archive

Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!spool.mu.edu!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!news.mathworks.com!news.kei.com!nntp.et.byu.edu!news.provo.novell.com!park.uvsc.edu!usenet
From: Terry Lambert <terry@cs.weber.edu>
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: FreeBSD on 286
Date: 16 May 1995 20:21:47 GMT
Organization: Utah Valley State College, Orem, Utah
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <3pb1gr$pkd@park.uvsc.edu>
References: <3or8nd$sn2@news.wco.com> <3p3vfd$14v@newsbf02.news.aol.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: hecate.artisoft.com

gljii@aol.com (GLJII) wrote:
]
] Didn't Xenix run on 286's?

Yes.  So did MicroPort UNIX as of SVR3.2, the last SV that didn't
need address relocation via mmu (and hence the last release for
the NCR Tower XP and Sperry(Unisys) 5000/50.

So did Minix, so did Coherent.

                                        Terry Lambert
                                        terry@cs.weber.edu
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.