*BSD News Article 44237


Return to BSD News archive

Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!yarrina.connect.com.au!classic.iinet.com.au!news.uoknor.edu!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!paladin.american.edu!gatech!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!lll-winken.llnl.gov!ames!onramp.arc.nasa.gov!viking.arc.nasa.gov!lamaster
From: lamaster@viking.arc.nasa.gov (Hugh LaMaster)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc
Subject: Re: NetBSD vs. FreeBSD
Date: 18 May 1995 21:05:08 GMT
Organization: NASA Ames Research Center
Lines: 43
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <3pgcq4$j5a@onramp.arc.nasa.gov>
References: <3np0bj$mli@news.nde.state.ne.us>
NNTP-Posting-Host: viking.arc.nasa.gov

In article <3np0bj$mli@news.nde.state.ne.us>, 
cwelch@esu3.esu3.k12.ne.us (Craig L Welch) writes:

|> Oh course, I'm posting this on the NetBSD newsgroup, so perhaps I'm 
|> already making the decision here, but I'm a Linux user lookig to support 
|> more people on the same hardware, and just generally interested in tryig 
|> something new (and perhaps more standard...) so, for me, this means 
|> NetBSD / FreeBSD.  Perhaps I'm just (foolishly) opening a can of worms, 
|> but what to people suggest, NetBSD or FreeBSD.  

Good question.

                                                   Here are some criterion:
|> 
|> General setup-ability and "ease of use" in terms of sysadmin

For example, is there an easy to install CD-ROM version 
available for a modest fee?  How about co-existence with 
DOS (an ugly necessity for many people)?

How about general emotional closeness to 4.3 BSD/4.4 BSD?  
Which OS is more historically BSD-ish?

How about the best (fastest, most robust, most bug-free) 
device drivers?  Which OS has better SCSI controller and 
Ethernet controller device drivers?

The fastest, most robust, most bug-free IP protocol stack?

|> General connectivity, PC (samba), Mac (Cap) 
|> Heavy on the Internet stuff/ httpd, ftpd, shell / pine,pop,security
|> Multi-OS capacity, Dosemu (what about the NetBSD one, limited windows 
|> like LInux??)  Mac (via Executor?)  this is obviously less of a concern, 
|> or I would just be staying with Linux and not even looking around.

Mac stuff - for me, that is a "don't care" ...


-- 
  Hugh LaMaster, M/S 233-9,     UUCP:      ames!lamaster
  NASA Ames Research Center     Internet:  lamaster@ames.arc.nasa.gov
  Moffett Field, CA 94035-1000  Or:        lamaster@george.arc.nasa.gov 
  Phone:  415/604-1056                     #include <std_disclaimer.h>