Return to BSD News archive
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!yarrina.connect.com.au!classic.iinet.com.au!news.uoknor.edu!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!paladin.american.edu!gatech!howland.reston.ans.net!math.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!lll-winken.llnl.gov!ames!cnn.nas.nasa.gov!lestat.nas.nasa.gov!thorpej From: thorpej@lestat.nas.nasa.gov (Jason R. Thorpe) Subject: Re: NetBSD vs. FreeBSD Message-ID: <D8szMI.FMI@cnn.nas.nasa.gov> Lines: 17 Sender: news@cnn.nas.nasa.gov (News Administrator) Nntp-Posting-Host: lestat.nas.nasa.gov Organization: Numerical Aerodynamic Simulation Project - NASA Ames References: <3np0bj$mli@news.nde.state.ne.us> <3pgcq4$j5a@onramp.arc.nasa.gov> Date: Fri, 19 May 1995 02:15:53 GMT In article <3pgcq4$j5a@onramp.arc.nasa.gov>, Hugh LaMaster <lamaster@viking.arc.nasa.gov> wrote: >How about the best (fastest, most robust, most bug-free) >device drivers? Which OS has better SCSI controller and >Ethernet controller device drivers? > >The fastest, most robust, most bug-free IP protocol stack? If one of your criteria is `most bug-free', then my leaning would be towards NetBSD; I watch both source-commit lists. -- Jason R. Thorpe thorpej@nas.nasa.gov NASA Ames Research Center Home: 408.866.1912 NAS: M/S 258-6 Work: 415.604.0935 Moffet Field, CA 94035 Pager: 415.428.6939