Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve gnu.misc.discuss:6104 comp.org.eff.talk:8909 comp.unix.bsd:4498 comp.os.mach:2044 news.groups:49621 Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss,comp.org.eff.talk,comp.unix.bsd,comp.os.mach,news.groups Path: sserve!manuel!munnari.oz.au!uunet!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!news.acns.nwu.edu!speedy.acns.nwu.edu!learn From: learn@speedy.acns.nwu.edu (William J. Vajk) Subject: Re: AT&T Long Distance Boycott (was: BNR2SS, Mach, and The Lawsuit) Message-ID: <1992Sep3.142341.7123@news.acns.nwu.edu> Sender: usenet@news.acns.nwu.edu (Usenet on news.acns) Organization: Dares No Organization Like Dis Organization References: <1992Sep1.180222.20077@blaze.cs.jhu.edu> <1992Sep2.171951.22044@gateway.novell.com> <BZS.92Sep2200645@ussr.std.com> Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1992 14:23:41 GMT Lines: 19 In article <BZS.92Sep2200645@ussr.std.com> Barry Shein writes: >A very reasonable discussion by Terry Lambert. Except for some substantial errors in atribution, eh? >The easy thing to do is take the readership summary and consider >posting to, say, 10 based on readership and coverage and perhaps 3-5 >more based on high potential interest level, or some formula like >that, with the followup-to carefully pointed at a relevant group >(alt.suit.att-bsdi comes to mind.) I see. Crossposting is not a villanous behavior after all. Mutlu will be glad you agree with him. You decide using your formula, he decides based on his, and the flamers will complain about both of you. Bill Vajk