*BSD News Article 45493


Return to BSD News archive

#! rnews 1433 sserve.cc.adfa.oz.au
Xref: sserve comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:2139 comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc:514
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!msunews!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!Germany.EU.net!news.dfn.de!zam103!hlrz24!melin
From: melin@hlrz24.hlrz.kfa-juelich.de (Stephan Melin)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc
Subject: FreeBSD/NetBSD (Information please, no flames or advocacy please)
Message-ID: <1995Jun15.223255@hlrz24.hlrz.kfa-juelich.de>
Date: 15 Jun 95 20:32:55 GMT
Sender: news@zam103.zam.kfa-juelich.de
Followup-To: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Organization: Forschungszentrum Juelich GmbH (KFA), Germany
Lines: 22
Nntp-Posting-Host: hlrz24

Hello all of you,

I want to install either FreeBSD or NetBSD on my Intel-PC. However I am not 
sure which one I should prefer. I do know that they both are build around
BSD4.4Lite and thus must be rather similar (to some extent).
But are there major differences? If so - which are the differences?

And last but not least: Which one do you think is the more stable one? - I do 
not want to spend my time debugging kernels, device drivers etc. (yet)...

I just want to gather some information, so please don't start threads like:
My <add your flavour>BSD is better than <the other flavour>BSD. (At least not
without giving some detailed reason ;-)

Best regards and many thanks in advance

    Stephan

-- 
Stephan Melin
melin@hlrserv.hlrz.kfa-juelich.de