Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.os.linux.advocacy:9356 comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:2284 Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!simtel!nexus.coast.net!oleane!jussieu.fr!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!agate!nickkral From: nickkral@sextans.EECS.Berkeley.EDU (Nick Kralevich) Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Subject: Re: BUGS in FreeBSD (Re: Linux vs. FreeBSD) Date: 20 Jun 1995 00:25:46 GMT Organization: Electrical Engineering Computer Science Department, University of California at Berkeley Lines: 25 Message-ID: <3s54ia$6sb@agate.berkeley.edu> References: <3qfhhv$7uc@titania.pps.pgh.pa.us> <3s47ev$gi@news.nynexst.com> <3s4fci$prm@agate.berkeley.edu> <3s4v7u$3ko@agate.berkeley.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: sextans.eecs.berkeley.edu In article <3s4v7u$3ko@agate.berkeley.edu>, Anthony Monroe <tmonroe@soda.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU> wrote: >Non-feature? Are we using the politically correct term here? It could very >well be a bug in the code. If you think it's wrong, fix it. I guess it's >a matter of perspective... Actually, I've talked to the author of the Linux port of the BSD networking tools. I'm planning on helping with the next release. The source for the BSD tools are available at: src.doc.ic.ac.uk:/computing/systems/unix/NetBSD-current/src And if the "non-feature" of the rwhod is still around in the updated source, then I fully intend to fix it (once I can find the time). It seems pretty easy to fix. It just needs to make sure that it checks the interfaces before it sends each packet. Take care, -- Nick Kralevich nickkral@cory.eecs.berkeley.edu -- LINUX, the FREE | University of California at | Nick Kralevich Operating System of the | Berkeley. Department of | nickkral@cory.eecs. future available via anon | Electrical Engineering and | berkeley.edu FTP. Ask me about it. | Computer Science. | finger for PGP