Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!nexus.coast.net!news.kei.com!news.mathworks.com!news.ultranet.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!spool.mu.edu!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!brutus.bright.net!infoserv.illinois.net!one.mind.net!news From: laird@mind.net (Alan Laird) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Subject: 2.0-950412-SNAP versus 2.0.5-RELEASE question Date: 21 Jun 1995 21:26:30 GMT Organization: InfoStructure Lines: 18 Message-ID: <3sa2q6$66j@one.mind.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: abraxas.mind.net Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.93.11 Hello, I haev been running 2.0r for a while and recently installed a new machine with the 950412 snapshot. I am thinking about installing 2.0.5-release on this machine but I am wondering which distribution is more stable. I am running this in a production environment and telling everyone how stable it is so if there is anything I can do in terms of selecting the best release level to increase stability, I will do it in an instant. I have read the documents that show the differences to 2.0.5 but what I am wondering is, In a nutshell, which release is more stable now that 2.0.5 is out and in use around the planet. Thanks in advance for anyone's comment. Alan Laird laird@mind.net