*BSD News Article 45858


Return to BSD News archive

Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!msunews!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!usc!nic-nac.CSU.net!newshub.sdsu.edu!saturn!larryr
From: larryr@saturn.sdsu.edu (Larry Riedel)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: Documentation project (was Re: Slight flame from Linux user)
Date: 15 Jun 1995 06:15:03 GMT
Organization: San Diego State University, College of Sciences
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <3roj57$l5s@pandora.sdsu.edu>
References: <3ql3gd$je2@bell.maths.tcd.ie> <3rhekp$400@hamilton.maths.tcd.ie> <3ri7d5$133@park.uvsc.edu> <3rl9gf$ps7@bell.maths.tcd.ie> <DA50ux.Krv@midway.uchicago.edu> <3rnmjc$fde@bell.maths.tcd.ie>
NNTP-Posting-Host: saturn.sdsu.edu
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]

Timothy Murphy (tim@maths.tcd.ie) wrote:
> Tim Pierce <twpierce@midway.uchicago.edu> writes:
> >
> > > Even so, I doubt if the approach of having sections written by
> > > different authors can lead to a good manual.
>
> > But he'll settle for it in his operating system.  Weird.
>
> (1) Linux is not "my" system.
> (2) Each of the Linux guides is written by a single author.
> (3) The guides can all be found at [...]

I may be wrong about the intent, but I took it to suggest that it
is weird that someone would think that having pieces of software
written by different programmers could lead to a good operating
system, but having sections of documentation written by different
authors could not lead to a good manual.  Is that reasonable?


Larry