*BSD News Article 46042


Return to BSD News archive

Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.bsdi.misc
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!simtel!news.sprintlink.net!hookup!remus.wat.hookup.net!metrics.com!tomh
From: tomh@metrics.com (Tom Haapanen)
Subject: Re: BSDi on a Gateway with a PCI Adaptec 2940 SCSI controller
Message-ID: <DAqFMx.2vx@metrics.com>
Organization: Software Metrics Inc.
Date: Sun, 25 Jun 1995 14:16:09 GMT
References: <3s9clg$2kn@sphinx.Gsu.EDU> <DALt49.6z7@wiz.com> <3sen88$lqo@news.enterprise.net> <DApHr7.Iwy@wiz.com>
Lines: 22


marc@wiz.com (Marc Wiz) writes:
> For what it's worth I've had no problem finding used 1742A's.  
> There are even plenty of new ones available albeit at the retail
> price of $450 which is what I paid for mine in January of 1993.

We, too, are now using a used 1742A, bought for the outrageous price of
C$100 (US$70), and it works well.

However, 99.8% of all new Pentium motherboards are PCI-based, and the
1742 just doesn't want to fit nicely into a PCI slot.  :(

While I, too, would prefer source code drivers, that didn't stop me from
using the object-only Digiboard driver -- nor does it stop us from using
other OSs (such as Windows NT) which *never* include source of any kind.

So, in conclusion, a binary-only 2740/2840/2940 driver would be far
preferable to no driver at all -- at least in my opinion.

-- 
[ /tom haapanen -- tomh@metrics.com -- software metrics inc -- waterloo, ont ]
[ "man, if you gotta ask you'll never know."              -- louis armstrong ]