Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.sys.powerpc:41964 comp.sys.intel:39424 comp.unix.bsd:16664 comp.unix.pc-clone.32bit:8663 comp.unix.sys5.r4:9879 comp.unix.misc:17498 comp.os.linux.development:24444 comp.os.linux.misc:49620 comp.os.386bsd.development:3343 comp.os.386bsd.misc:5713 comp.os.misc:4084 Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!simtel!news.sprintlink.net!kaleka.seanet.com!not-for-mail From: kanefsky@datamagic.com (Steve Kanefsky) Newsgroups: comp.sys.powerpc,comp.sys.intel,comp.unix.bsd,comp.unix.pc-clone.32bit,comp.unix.sys5.r4,comp.unix.misc,comp.os.linux.development,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.386bsd.development,comp.os.386bsd.misc,comp.os.misc Subject: Re: X on dial-in Date: 1 Jul 1995 16:40:52 -0700 Organization: Data Magic Lines: 20 Message-ID: <3t4me4$5mh@datamagic.com> References: <3shogq$am8@datamagic.com> <1995Jun30.202028.1052@light-house.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: kanefsky1.seanet.com In article <1995Jun30.202028.1052@light-house.com>, <las@light-house.com> wrote: >Steve Kanefsky (kanefsky@datamagic.com) wrote: > >: I find this very difficult to believe. First of all, any ISP worth his >: salt (and certainly the ones I've been referring to) has at least two >: path-diverse T1's going to a T3 (or better) backbone, and they may be >: dedicated T1's and not frame-relay. I think they run into the thousands > >Few. > >Most of the small-time operators don't even have a fractional T1. Well Terry was throwing figures around assuming 3000 users. That's not small-time and I seriously doubt they have anything less than a T1. The ISP I use for my dedicated line has more like 2000 users and still has two path-diverse T1s. -- Steve Kanefsky