*BSD News Article 46785


Return to BSD News archive

Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!simtel!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!agate!violet.berkeley.edu!jkh
From: jkh@violet.berkeley.edu (Jordan K. Hubbard)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: iijppp and kernel ppp device
Date: 14 Jul 1995 12:05:20 GMT
Organization: University of California, Berkeley
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <3u5mi0$gk0@agate.berkeley.edu>
References: <3u3co4$hur@Mars.mcs.com> <DBo868.802@net-tel.co.uk> <3u4v3n$5ie@agate.berkeley.edu> <mschoene.805713265@hobbes>
NNTP-Posting-Host: violet.berkeley.edu

In article <mschoene.805713265@hobbes>,
Martin Schoenert <mschoene@Math.RWTH-Aachen.DE> wrote:
>jkh@violet.berkeley.edu (Jordan K. Hubbard) writes:
>
>    Have you tried giving the ppp process real-time priority?  (see
>    rtprio(2) :-)
>
>Why the smiley?
>Do you think the 'ppp' process would starve the rest of the system?

I don't think it'd necessarily starve it, though that depends a lot on
the resources it's using up.  It would certainly drastically reduce the
system's proclivity for swapping it out though.

The smiley is because it's a gross solution to the problem.. :-)

					Jordan