Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!simtel!zombie.ncsc.mil!news.mathworks.com!newshost.marcam.com!usc!cs.utexas.edu!news.sprintlink.net!EU.net!Germany.EU.net!zib-berlin.de!news.tu-chemnitz.de!irz401!uriah.heep!bonnie.heep!not-for-mail
From: j@bonnie.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: Which version of FreeBSD to run
Date: 17 Jul 1995 12:31:18 +0200
Organization: Private U**x site, Dresden.
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <3ude5m$jo@bonnie.tcd-dresden.de>
References: <3u8sf3$e5d@is1.hk.super.net>
Reply-To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de
NNTP-Posting-Host: 192.109.108.139
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Mr Eric Ho <eric@is1.hk.super.net> wrote:
>
>I am considering setting up a FreeBSD machine in a production
>environment to serve a few people. My question is which version should I
>run (in terms of stability)? Any comment will be appreciated and thanks in
>advance!
2.0.5. If you can find a copy, you could also use 1.1.5.1. It's no
longer supported, and you miss some of the newer features, but IMVVHO
it's a bit more stable than 2.0.5 (YMMV).
--
cheers, J"org private: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de
http://www.sax.de/~joerg/
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)