*BSD News Article 48179


Return to BSD News archive

Xref: sserve comp.windows.x:80492 comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc:708
Path: sserve!euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.mira.net.au!werple.mira.net.au!gfm
From: gfm@werple.mira.net.au (Graham Menhennitt)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x,comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc
Subject: Re: MWM on XFree86 V3.1.1 / NetBSD V1.0A
Followup-To: comp.windows.x,comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc
Date: 2 Aug 1995 03:10:30 GMT
Organization: werple public-access Internet, Melbourne
Lines: 12
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <3vmqb6$4a3@eplet.mira.net.au>
References: <1995Jul23.100140.10651@eisner> <3v0lji$s9d@inews.sc.intel.com> <3v2rvi$4th@news.rhrz.uni-bonn.de> <3v8hcc$pd5@inews.sc.intel.com> <3vb301$m83@news.rhrz.uni-bonn.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: werple.mira.net.au
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]

Henry G. Juengst (juengst@saph2.physik.uni-bonn.de) wrote:

: The question should not be MWM vs. FVWM, it must be Motif vs. "what else?".

But the question WAS fvwm vs. mwm!!!

I have SWiM Motif but don't use mwm because I like fvwm better. If I
am doing development or building some software that I picked up on the
net, then certainly I use the Motif development includes/libraries.
I don't have to use mwm to do that.

Graham