Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!simtel!news.sprintlink.net!in1.uu.net!nctuccca.edu.tw!news.cc.nctu.edu.tw!news.sinica!taob
From: taob@gate.sinica.edu.tw (Brian Tao)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: Why isn't NetBSD popular?
Date: 29 Aug 1995 09:42:52 GMT
Organization: Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <41unes$3on@gate.sinica.edu.tw>
References: <40q6mm$c0l@scotsman.ed.ac.uk> <5s7t-3RzoRB@subloch.swb.de> <JTC.95Aug18133112@rtl.cygnus.com> <5s$kBctUoRB@subloch.swb.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: @140.109.40.248
Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc:844 comp.os.linux.advocacy:18016 comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:4985
In article <5s$kBctUoRB@subloch.swb.de>, Stefan Huerter <maulwurf@subloch.swb.de> wrote:
>
>> As far as I know, neither Linux or *BSD have passed a POSIX
>> conformance test. So strictly speaking, Linux is not POSIX.
>
>So, what is Linux? nothing?
Heh, you need to ask? ;-)
--
Brian ("Though this be madness, yet there is method in't") Tao
taob@gate.sinica.edu.tw <-- work ........ play --> taob@io.org