Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!simtel!pravda.aa.msen.com!spool.mu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!news.uoregon.edu!news.rediris.es!ordago.uc3m.es!news From: jgb@ordago.uc3m.es (Jesus M. Gonzalez Barahona) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc Subject: Re: Better editor than vi Date: 31 Aug 1995 11:05:59 GMT Organization: GSYC, Univ. Carlos III Madrid, Spain. Lines: 19 Message-ID: <JGB.95Aug31120600@hola.uc3m.es> References: <423nju$i93@mirv.unsw.edu.au> NNTP-Posting-Host: hola.uc3m.es In-reply-to: alexl@vast.unsw.edu.au's message of 31 Aug 1995 07:16:14 GMT In article <423nju$i93@mirv.unsw.edu.au> alexl@vast.unsw.edu.au (Alex Lam) writes: > From: alexl@vast.unsw.edu.au (Alex Lam) > Can anyone suggest a good editor for the NetBSD ? > > Something like emacs perharps ? JED ? > If you have X and at least 16M of RAM, I'd suggest last version of Xemacs. To me, it looks impressive, and you need almost no emacs knowledge if you want just to use it. The whole emacs is below, anyway, so that you can also use all its goodies if you know how. It's main problem, for me, is how machine-hungry it is. Jesus. PS: The above, for NetBSD/i386.