*BSD News Article 49890


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!simtel!lll-winken.llnl.gov!ames!cnn.nas.nasa.gov!lestat.nas.nasa.gov!thorpej
From: thorpej@lestat.nas.nasa.gov (Jason R. Thorpe)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc,comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: DEBATE:  BSD vs. Linux
Date: 1 Sep 1995 00:48:37 GMT
Organization: Numerical Aerodynamic Simulation Project - NASA Ames
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <425l95$85v@cnn.nas.nasa.gov>
References: <4233kp$t8p@hilly.apci.net> <425a9b$89r@felix.junction.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lestat.nas.nasa.gov
Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc:879 comp.os.linux.advocacy:18618

In article <425a9b$89r@felix.junction.net>,
Michael Dillon <michael@okjunc.junction.net> wrote:

>You should stick with Linux because it works for you and you know what it 
>can do and how to make it do that. You should also try FreeBSD because 
>for some things it is better and it is good to have more than one O/S in 
>your bag of tricks.

I beg to differ ... He mentioned Sun and DEC in his previous post.  While
he is currently not considering those platforms, he _may_ do so in the
future.  Why lock yourself into one platform?  NetBSD currently runs
extremely well on Intel-based platforms, as well as 11 others, including
the Sun 4/4c and DEC Alpha.  It's good to have more than one platform
in your bag of tricks :-)

-- 
Jason R. Thorpe                                       thorpej@nas.nasa.gov
NASA Ames Research Center                               Home: 408.866.1912
NAS: M/S 258-6                                          Work: 415.604.0935
Moffett Field, CA 94035                                Pager: 415.428.6939