Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!simtel!lll-winken.llnl.gov!overload.lbl.gov!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!gatech!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!EE-UFlorida!rr From: rr@eel.ufl.edu (Mahesh Ramachandran) Newsgroups: news.software.nntp,comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Subject: Re: INN sharedactive.patch problems with FreeBSD 2.0.5R Date: 27 Aug 1995 18:35:38 GMT Organization: Electrical Engineering, University of Florida Lines: 13 Distribution: world Message-ID: <41qdtq$gfj@huron.eel.ufl.edu> References: <41laoo$ajq@xymox.dsw.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: iriquois.eel.ufl.edu X-newsreader: xrn 7.00 (Motif) Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au news.software.nntp:15420 comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:5374 In article <41laoo$ajq@xymox.dsw.com>, pete@inquo.net (Pete Kruckenberg) writes: > Has anyone had good experiences running this on any platform? It seems > quite unstable to me? I think that the whole semaphore thing might need yep, I've been using it on hpux 9.x without any problems. However I have been using the kernel semaphore undo feature, ie XSEM_UNDO != 0. -rr --