Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!msunews!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!news.sprintlink.net!EU.net!Germany.EU.net!news.dfn.de!fu-berlin.de!zrz.TU-Berlin.DE!cs.tu-berlin.de!zib-berlin.de!irz401!uriah.heep!bonnie.heep!not-for-mail
From: j@bonnie.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: ld.so failed
Date: 5 Sep 1995 11:34:21 +0200
Organization: Private U**x site, Dresden.
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <42h5it$1u3@bonnie.tcd-dresden.de>
References: <42dk7r$r6n@shore.shore.net> <nfka7ozgia.fsf@big-brother.csrv.uidaho.edu>
Reply-To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de
NNTP-Posting-Host: 192.109.108.139
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Faried Nawaz <fn@uidaho.edu> wrote:
>$ Any chance of making the activator print something
>$ more inteligable than ``ld.so failed'' in the next
>$ release, if that hasn't already been done.
>
>seconded.
What does `seconded' mean? Wow, you've actually hacked it to do this?
Great! Use send-pr to submit us your patch! Thanks!
:-)
--
cheers, J"org private: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de
http://www.sax.de/~joerg/
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)