Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!simtel!news.kei.com!news.mathworks.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.sprintlink.net!helena.MT.net!nate From: nate@trout.sri.MT.net (Nate Williams) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Subject: Re: ld.so failed Date: 5 Sep 1995 20:52:48 GMT Organization: SRI Intl. - Montana Operations Lines: 17 Message-ID: <42idb0$b6k@helena.MT.net> References: <42dk7r$r6n@shore.shore.net> Reply-To: "Nate Williams" <nate@sneezy.sri.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: trout.sri.mt.net In article <42dk7r$r6n@shore.shore.net>, <witr@spooky.rwwa.com> wrote: >Any chance of making the activator print something >more inteligable than ``ld.so failed'' in the next >release, if that hasn't already been done. Such as? Remember, every byte added to the activator adds one byte to *every* single program in the entire tree. Bytes add up fast when you are talking hundreds or programs. Nate -- nate@sneezy.sri.com | Research Engineer, SRI Intl. - Montana Operations nate@trout.sri.MT.net | Loving life in God's country, the great state of work #: (406) 449-7662 | Montana. Wanna go fly fishing? I don't charge or home #: (406) 443-7063 | feed you, but I do know the area pretty well.