*BSD News Article 51634


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!msunews!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.wwa.com!jaykuri
From: jaykuri@wwa.com (Jason Kuri)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc,comp.windows.x.i386unix
Subject: Re: The Broken ATI Mach64... correct me if I'm wrong...
Followup-To: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc,comp.windows.x.i386unix
Date: 24 Sep 1995 23:26:10 GMT
Organization: WorldWide Access - Chicago Area Internet Services
Lines: 20
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <444pei$m5f@sake.wwa.com>
References: <442dfj$7uk@sake.wwa.com> <4448vo$fnr@news.greatbasin.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: miso.wwa.com
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:6418 comp.windows.x.i386unix:17778

Eric Blood (eblood@cs.unr.edu) wrote:
: jaykuri@wwa.com (Jason Kuri) wrote:
: > As an aside, (and in defense of ATI?) I want to say that I have a VLB ATI 
: >Xpression card (with the Chrontel chip) and it works beautifully.  I 
: >also have a PCI version of the same card and it does not.
: There are two machines here (both PCI) one with an ATI Xpression bought
: about 6 months ago, and another with the same card bought last week.
: Both have FreeBSD up and running with X running at 1024x768 and 1280x1024.
: No problems there.
    To Clarify, as I suppose it is a little ambiguous, The PCI card I 
referred to has the new AT&T chip in it, whereas the VLB version has the 
original Chrontel.  Additionally, I'm using Xfree86.  

Jay

---
Mind you, I don't mean to say that I know, of my own knowledge, what 
there is particularly dead about a door-nail.  I might have been 
inclined, myself, to regard a coffin-nail as the deadest piece of 
ironmongery in the trade.