Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!simtel!news.kei.com!news.mathworks.com!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!in2.uu.net!news.greatbasin.net!usenet From: Eric Blood <eblood@cs.unr.edu> Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc,comp.windows.x.i386unix Subject: Re: The Broken ATI Mach64... correct me if I'm wrong... Date: 24 Sep 1995 18:45:12 GMT Organization: Great Basin Internet Services, Reno, NV Lines: 13 Distribution: world Message-ID: <4448vo$fnr@news.greatbasin.net> References: <442dfj$7uk@sake.wwa.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: winky.reno.nv.us Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1N (X11; I; BSD/386 uname failed) X-URL: news:442dfj$7uk@sake.wwa.com Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:6697 comp.windows.x.i386unix:17861 jaykuri@wwa.com (Jason Kuri) wrote: > As an aside, (and in defense of ATI?) I want to say that I have a VLB ATI >Xpression card (with the Chrontel chip) and it works beautifully. I >also have a PCI version of the same card and it does not. There are two machines here (both PCI) one with an ATI Xpression bought about 6 months ago, and another with the same card bought last week. Both have FreeBSD up and running with X running at 1024x768 and 1280x1024. No problems there. Eric Blood eblood@cs.unr.edu