*BSD News Article 52742


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!simtel!zombie.ncsc.mil!news.mathworks.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!inet-nntp-gw-1.us.oracle.com!news.caldera.com!news.cc.utah.edu!park.uvsc.edu!usenet
From: Terry Lambert <terry@cs.weber.edu>
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: Linux Killer App (ksmbfs)
Date: 9 Oct 1995 22:34:50 GMT
Organization: Utah Valley State College, Orem, Utah
Lines: 45
Message-ID: <45c82b$mki@park.uvsc.edu>
References: <44cma4$fv4@hole.sdsu.edu> <44f0v9$83@park.uvsc.edu> <44hn74$pbj@hole.sdsu.edu> <454aet$oja@park.uvsc.edu> <457flc$2iq@hole.sdsu.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: hecate.artisoft.com

larryr@saturn.sdsu.edu (Larry Riedel) wrote:
] > You may want to get together with others who feel as you do and
] > make a project of it.
] 
] I personally don't mind using Linux.  I just think something
] like ksmbfs would be a worthwhile addition to FreeBSD.  I am
] not concerned about who would develop the feature.

I think something like ksmbfs is worthwhile only for single user
desktop machines, where a single client credential universally
applied to all FS services consumers on the platform is an
acceptable thing.

For the most part, I think both Linux and FreeBSD do *not* fall
into this definition.

Therefore, I think that a ksmbfs would have to be significantly
rearchitected along the lines of the NUC (NetWare UNIX Client)
commercial server-client-as-file-system for it to be generally
useful.

Even on Linux.

You are welcome to do that work, after which I will help you
implement.  Probably a full architecting and implementation
would fall under my non-disclosure as a former Novell employee
who has had his hands in the NUC code.  I also advised on the
Samba list when this was first discussed) (which means that I
know what I am talking about when I condemn KSMBFS as a toy).

You are also welcome to ignore my advice and implement the limited
and therefore generally useless Linux KSMBFS code under BSD; it
is significantly easier to add an FS to BSD in any case.


Attempting to set this up as a "selling point" for Linux vs. BSD
is not, however, welcome.  Take it to the advocacy groups, please.


					Regards,
                                        Terry Lambert
                                        terry@cs.weber.edu
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.