Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.os.linux:10401 comp.unix.bsd:5342 comp.os.mach:2171 comp.unix.sysv386:23902 Newsgroups: comp.os.linux,comp.unix.bsd,comp.os.mach,comp.unix.sysv386 Path: sserve!manuel!munnari.oz.au!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!usenet.coe.montana.edu!news.u.washington.edu!serval!yoda.eecs.wsu.edu!hlu From: hlu@yoda.eecs.wsu.edu (H.J. Lu) Subject: Re: RFD: comp.os.linux split Message-ID: <1992Sep19.174609.11615@serval.net.wsu.edu> Sender: news@serval.net.wsu.edu (USENET News System) Organization: Washington State University References: <634.9209181344@pepper.cam-orl.co.uk> <716874282snx@temple.demon.co.uk.demon.co.uk> <BALASUB.92Sep19035200@organ.cis.ohio-state.edu> Date: Sat, 19 Sep 92 17:46:09 GMT Lines: 19 In article <BALASUB.92Sep19035200@organ.cis.ohio-state.edu> balasub@organ.cis.ohio-state.edu (Krishna Balasubramanian) writes: > >Perhaps what is needed is an XFree86 group that >handles the new X386/XFree86 users from the >various groups ... comp.os.linux, comp.unix.bsd, >comp.os.mach and comp.unix.sysv386. >comp.windows.xfree86? > >The present linux X11 port for example is very close >to being standard xfree86. > >So far none of the other proposed splits appeal >to me. > >krishna I second this one. H.J.