*BSD News Article 5294


Return to BSD News archive

Xref: sserve comp.os.linux:10401 comp.unix.bsd:5342 comp.os.mach:2171 comp.unix.sysv386:23902
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux,comp.unix.bsd,comp.os.mach,comp.unix.sysv386
Path: sserve!manuel!munnari.oz.au!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!usenet.coe.montana.edu!news.u.washington.edu!serval!yoda.eecs.wsu.edu!hlu
From: hlu@yoda.eecs.wsu.edu (H.J. Lu)
Subject: Re: RFD: comp.os.linux split
Message-ID: <1992Sep19.174609.11615@serval.net.wsu.edu>
Sender: news@serval.net.wsu.edu (USENET News System)
Organization: Washington State University
References: <634.9209181344@pepper.cam-orl.co.uk> <716874282snx@temple.demon.co.uk.demon.co.uk> <BALASUB.92Sep19035200@organ.cis.ohio-state.edu>
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 92 17:46:09 GMT
Lines: 19

In article <BALASUB.92Sep19035200@organ.cis.ohio-state.edu> balasub@organ.cis.ohio-state.edu (Krishna Balasubramanian) writes:
>
>Perhaps what is needed is an XFree86 group that
>handles the new X386/XFree86 users from the
>various groups ... comp.os.linux, comp.unix.bsd,
>comp.os.mach and comp.unix.sysv386. 
>comp.windows.xfree86?
>
>The present linux X11 port for example is very close
>to being standard xfree86.
>
>So far none of the other proposed splits appeal
>to me.
>
>krishna

I second this one.

H.J.