Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!yarrina.connect.com.au!classic.iinet.com.au!swing.iinet.net.au!news.uoregon.edu!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!news.mathworks.com!news.kei.com!ub!galileo.cc.rochester.edu!ceas.rochester.edu!ceas.rochester.edu!not-for-mail From: iyengar@galaxy.ee.rochester.edu (Manu Iyengar) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Subject: Re: 2.0.5 on Intel EtherExpress Date: 26 Oct 1995 21:39:06 -0400 Organization: University of Rochester, School of Engineering Lines: 15 Message-ID: <46pd7q$l3t@galaxy.ee.rochester.edu> References: <SCOTTE.95Oct18074604@odie.center.uscs.com> <YkXajVq00YUsA3P1Ip@andrew.cmu.edu> <46maqp$7gb@tampa2.is.ge.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: galaxy.ee.rochester.edu In article <46maqp$7gb@tampa2.is.ge.com>, Jim Smithson <jrs@tampa2.is.ge.com> wrote: > >I had a problem initially but managed to RTFM and figure out what I did >wrong(not mapping the 32K RAM correctly). >It was indeed an Intel Etherexpress card and it does work. >And I was using 2.0.5 from the CD. >But I've heard from at least one person about having problems getting 2 EE16s >to work in the same box(I've not tried that). > I've got 2 EE16s in one of them spankin' fast Micron Pentium boxes. No problems really. Had to add the extra device (ix1) of course. What kind of problems are coming up?