*BSD News Article 53784


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!yarrina.connect.com.au!classic.iinet.com.au!swing.iinet.net.au!news.uoregon.edu!news.bc.net!news.mindlink.net!agate!tfs.com!mailhub.tfs.com!julian
From: julian@mailhub.tfs.com (Julian Elischer)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: Problem With Fujitsu SCSI Drive
Date: 26 Oct 1995 06:44:38 GMT
Organization: TRW Financial Systems, Oakland, CA
Lines: 73
Message-ID: <46naom$g4u@times.tfs.com>
References: <814658177.16718@kiss.demon.co.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: mailhub.tfs.com

In article <814658177.16718@kiss.demon.co.uk>,
Phil Taylor <phil@zipmail.co.uk> wrote:
>
>1023 cyls 63 hds and 32 secs.
that's 64 heads..
this is the LAST HEAD
i.e. 0-63
dos (of course!) numbers it;s sectors 1-32
so the last sector is 32 giving 32 sectors

the geometry to use  is therefore:

64 heads 32 sectors..
the cylinders can effectively be ignored.. nothing uses it.. :)

>When I ran fbsd install/fdisk again this time the geometry was
>detected as:
>
>1033 cyls 64 hds and 32 secs. !!!!
>  ^^       ^
correct!

>
>The first time I left it at this and finished the install, after a few
>reboots/power-cycles when fsck was running the drive seemed to be
>hitting the end-stop and making some 'very funny noises'.

but it DID reboot, right?

the funny noises were probably hardware recalibrates
as it tried to recover from an error.

>
>I got a lot of very nasty looking HARDWARE FAILURE errors and quite a
>few vm - probable hardware fault and the occasional help me message !!
vm?
the HARDWARE FAILURE messages from the SCSI would be useful..
POSSIBLY you might have made the partition too big..

on bootop the drive's total available secotrs should be reported..

do you go beyond this?


>
>I can post the actual messages if required but I think you get the
>general idea, it was not happy 8-(
>
actual messages help..

>I didn't think that the scsi drive would allow fbsd to tell it to go
>to an area of disk that doesn't exist but I thought I would try what
>DOS had suggested 1023/63/32.

that's going to MAYBE work.... (depending on how you do it
it might only access a part of your drive..)
If you have errors on your SWAP partition, that would explain the vm problem..
fsck can use a LOT of vm..

>

you may need to turn on error recovery
see scsi(8)


+----------------------------------+       ______ _  __
|   __--_|\  Julian Elischer       |       \     U \/ / On assignment
|  /       \ julian@tfs.com        +------>x   USA    \ in a very strange
| (   OZ    ) 300 lakeside Dr. oakland CA. \___   ___ | country !
+- X_.---._/  USA+(510) 645-3137(wk)           \_/   \\            
          v