Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!simtel!chi-news.cic.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!btnet!dispatch.news.demon.net!demon!mail2news.demon.co.uk!osvif.demon.co.uk
From: Tim Crowther <Tim@osvif.demon.co.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: Is Cyrix a good idea?
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 95 09:30:41 GMT
Organization: Myorganisation
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <814440641snz@osvif.demon.co.uk>
References: <syssgm.814105846@pandora>
Reply-To: Tim@osvif.demon.co.uk
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: osvif.demon.co.uk
X-Newsreader: Demon Internet Simple News v1.30
In article <syssgm.814105846@pandora>
syssgm@devetir.qld.gov.au "Stephen McKay" writes:
> Am I about to buy a turkey, or are Cyrix chips now first
> rate processors?
>
No problem with Cryix stuff, I have used several of the
upgrade (386 to 486) chips at work without a hitch.
--
Tim Crowther (at Work)
[ Never trust a software engineer with a screwdriver ]