*BSD News Article 55336


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!simtel!news.kei.com!wang!uunet!in1.uu.net!usc!news.cerf.net!proton.llumc.edu!galaxy.ucr.edu!dostoevsky.ucr.edu!js
From: js@dostoevsky.ucr.edu (Joe Sloan)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.networking,comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc,comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix
Subject: Re: Linux or Free BSD for WWW server?
Date: 17 Nov 1995 02:36:11 GMT
Organization: University Of California
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <48gser$qpa@galaxy.ucr.edu>
References: <47oul2$35j@kadath.zeitgeist.net> <47ojep$rr1@dns.crocker.com> <48dmg9$lc1@galaxy.ucr.edu> <30AB8366.1135@whitetiger.engr.sgi.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: dostoevsky.ucr.edu
Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.os.linux.networking:20463 comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:9235 comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix:6731

In article <30AB8366.1135@whitetiger.engr.sgi.com>,
Todd Hoff  <tmh@whitetiger.engr.sgi.com> wrote:
>Joe Sloan wrote:
>> I've been running 2 www servers, 1 linux and 1 FreeBSD, both apache.
>> 
>> Both seem very stable, and I think either one would be a good choice.
>> 
>> OTOH, some lame thing like "website" for nt would be a real pain.
>
>Oh yes, that point and click installation, settup, and stats
>was ever so difficult. Wish i could have got down and dirty with 
>command line programs but unfortunately i didn't need to. Nor have i
>in the last 6 months of near flawless operation.

I have no complaints about apache - It takes all of 20 minutes 
to go from source code to running www server...

Unfortunately, to run website for nt, I'd have to run nt. 
Yuck. It ain't gonna happen.

--
 Joe Sloan                 |    http://dostoevsky.ucr.edu
 jjs@engr.ucr.edu          |    College of Engineering
 Upgrade to Linux95!       |    University of California
~