Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!simtel!news.kei.com!wang!uunet!in1.uu.net!usc!news.cerf.net!proton.llumc.edu!galaxy.ucr.edu!dostoevsky.ucr.edu!js From: js@dostoevsky.ucr.edu (Joe Sloan) Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.networking,comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc,comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix Subject: Re: Linux or Free BSD for WWW server? Date: 17 Nov 1995 02:36:11 GMT Organization: University Of California Lines: 26 Message-ID: <48gser$qpa@galaxy.ucr.edu> References: <47oul2$35j@kadath.zeitgeist.net> <47ojep$rr1@dns.crocker.com> <48dmg9$lc1@galaxy.ucr.edu> <30AB8366.1135@whitetiger.engr.sgi.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: dostoevsky.ucr.edu Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.os.linux.networking:20463 comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:9235 comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix:6731 In article <30AB8366.1135@whitetiger.engr.sgi.com>, Todd Hoff <tmh@whitetiger.engr.sgi.com> wrote: >Joe Sloan wrote: >> I've been running 2 www servers, 1 linux and 1 FreeBSD, both apache. >> >> Both seem very stable, and I think either one would be a good choice. >> >> OTOH, some lame thing like "website" for nt would be a real pain. > >Oh yes, that point and click installation, settup, and stats >was ever so difficult. Wish i could have got down and dirty with >command line programs but unfortunately i didn't need to. Nor have i >in the last 6 months of near flawless operation. I have no complaints about apache - It takes all of 20 minutes to go from source code to running www server... Unfortunately, to run website for nt, I'd have to run nt. Yuck. It ain't gonna happen. -- Joe Sloan | http://dostoevsky.ucr.edu jjs@engr.ucr.edu | College of Engineering Upgrade to Linux95! | University of California ~