Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!nntp.coast.net!news.kei.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!netnews.nwnet.net!nwnet.net!not-for-mail From: aad@nwnet.net (Anthony D'Atri) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Subject: Re: NetBSD camp reaction to OpenBSD? Date: 29 Nov 1995 09:21:42 -0800 Organization: NorthWestNet, Bellevue, WA Lines: 13 Message-ID: <49i4r6$97c@olympus.nwnet.net> References: <30B6A790.41C67EA6@FreeBSD.org> <49adtb$6p1@cynic.portal.ca> Reply-To: aad@nwnet.net NNTP-Posting-Host: olympus.nwnet.net Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc:1403 comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:9460 >Why should they be? Have you counted the number of different >`distributions' of Linux lately? It's something like 18, I'm told. It's one of the reasons why I decided against the PC-Unix route and bought a used Sun. >user space differences between the Net/Free/Open/whateverBSDs that >you do between the different Linux distributions. They can't even >agree on a common directory hierarchy. Or object-file format. As I understand it, many (all?) of them don't even come with dump(1).