Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.mel.connect.com.au!yarrina.connect.com.au!news.mel.aone.net.au!inferno.mpx.com.au!news.unimelb.EDU.AU!munnari.OZ.AU!ihnp4.ucsd.edu!agate!reason.cdrom.com!usenet From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@FreeBSD.org> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc,comp.unix.advocacy,comp.unix.misc,comp.unix.pc-clone.32bit Subject: Re: Linux vs FreeBSD Date: Thu, 23 Nov 1995 06:04:49 -0800 Organization: Walnut Creek CDROM Lines: 14 Message-ID: <30B47F81.41C67EA6@FreeBSD.org> References: <489kuu$rbo@pelican.cs.ucla.edu> <48ajsj$f5p@galaxy.ucr.edu> <490p3m$6c7@news.iii.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: time.cdrom.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0b2 (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.1-STABLE i386) To: Craig Shrimpton <craigs@os.com> Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.os.linux.advocacy:28554 comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:9500 comp.unix.advocacy:11474 comp.unix.misc:19706 comp.unix.pc-clone.32bit:8894 Craig Shrimpton wrote: > > In article <48ajsj$f5p@galaxy.ucr.edu>, > > > > >They are both bitchen. > > > I think FreeBSD excels in fast networking and I/O activity but I think it > makes a terrible Web server or shell machine. Linux is more suitable for > interactive type work but blows as a network router. May I ask by which data you came to your conclusions? -- Jordan