*BSD News Article 55704


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.mel.connect.com.au!yarrina.connect.com.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.hawaii.edu!ames!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in2.uu.net!news.iii.net!jupiter
From: craigs@os.com (Craig Shrimpton)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc,comp.unix.advocacy,comp.unix.misc,comp.unix.pc-clone.32bit
Subject: Re: Linux vs FreeBSD
Date: 23 Nov 1995 03:16:51 GMT
Organization: Shrimpton Consulting
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <490p3m$6c7@news.iii.net>
References: <489kuu$rbo@pelican.cs.ucla.edu> <48ajsj$f5p@galaxy.ucr.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 199.232.47.66
X-Newsreader: News Xpress Version 1.0 Beta #4
Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.os.linux.advocacy:28600 comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:9518 comp.unix.advocacy:11497 comp.unix.misc:19707 comp.unix.pc-clone.32bit:8896

In article <48ajsj$f5p@galaxy.ucr.edu>,

>
>They are both bitchen.
>

My sentiments exactly!

I really think you need both if you want to run an ISP.  FreeBSD for your 
network gateway/router and news server.  Linux for your FTP/Web/Shell machine.

I think FreeBSD excels in fast networking and I/O activity but I think it 
makes a terrible Web server or shell machine.  Linux is more suitable for 
interactive type work but blows as a network router.  

If all you want is a home Unix PC, either is fine but Linux is probably easier 
for a newbie.

Craig


===================================================================
Shrimpton Consulting                         Orbit Systems
Craig Shrimpton                              Email:  craigs@os.com
17 Monroe Avenue                             Phone:  (508) 753-8776
Worcester, MA 01602                          http://www.os.com/