Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!nntp.coast.net!vtc.tacom.army.mil!news2.acs.oakland.edu!izzy.net!news From: "Patirick S. Roberts (NTT)" <root@execu.comshare.com> Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd.bsdi.misc Subject: Re: Netscape Commerce Server on FreeBSD vs BSDI? Date: Fri, 01 Dec 1995 15:44:45 -0800 Organization: National TechTeam Inc. Lines: 16 Message-ID: <30BF936D.6F50E556@execu.comshare.com> References: <49g2hp$i6q@tampa2.is.ge.com> <49ha19$22f@times.tfs.com> <1995Nov29.222811.782@system9.unisys.com> <49l2vd$cmo@zuul.nmti.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: execu.comshare.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0b2 (X11; I; Linux 1.2.0 i586) CC: cat@system9.unisys.com Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:9559 comp.unix.bsd.bsdi.misc:1575 In article <1995Nov29.222811.782@system9.unisys.com>, Cat Okita <cat@system9.unisys.com> wrote: > It's not hard to understand that some people prefer to work > with a recognizable corporate entity where agreements can > be drawn up and all parties involved will be bound by them. I'd be interested in what agreements of any value these corporate entities could make with Microsoft or IBM. Each of the corporations I've been sited at recently had to make concessions, in addition to the complete abdication of responsibility indicated on the media regarding licensing agreements. Yeesh. Only the small companies that *need* the business knuckle under and sign any kind of agreements with customers. Alan Frabutt (alanf@comshare.com) disclaimer: I don't speak for Comshare, TechTeam, etc...