Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.rmit.EDU.AU!news.unimelb.EDU.AU!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!news.ysu.edu!ns.mcs.kent.edu!kira.cc.uakron.edu!odin.oar.net!malgudi.oar.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.kei.com!nntp.et.byu.edu!news.caldera.com!park.uvsc.edu!usenet
From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: Now that 2.1 is out. What next?
Date: 9 Dec 1995 09:30:15 GMT
Organization: Utah Valley State College, Orem, Utah
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <4abkv7$pqr@park.uvsc.edu>
References: <slrn4bl49t.9dt.coleman@redwood.skiles.gatech.edu> <30C1044A.41C67EA6@FreeBSD.org> <4a230j$7m0@gap.cco.caltech.edu> <4a5lfr$i4c@cyber1.servtech.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: hecate.artisoft.com
rmillian@cyber1.servtech.com (rudynel millian) wrote:
]
] What about multi threading? How high is multi threading on the
] priority list? Multi threading may be more useful than multi processor
] support.
Kernel or user space? User space is in -current now.
Kernel is on my list, but I believe it is free with the SMP
synchronization for kernel reeentrancy.
Terry Lambert
terry@cs.weber.edu
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.