Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!nntp.coast.net!news.kei.com!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!hamblin.math.byu.edu!park.uvsc.edu!usenet
From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc,comp.unix.advocacy
Subject: Re: Win32 CreateThread() vs Unix fork()
Date: 14 Dec 1995 05:18:05 GMT
Organization: Utah Valley State College, Orem, Utah
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <4aoc2d$sqv@park.uvsc.edu>
References: <4ab85f$idq@news.voicenet.com> <4adu72$nkf@heathers.stdio.com> <4aig98$mca@madeline.ins.cwru.edu> <4akev2$e07@rznews.rrze.uni-erlangen.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: hecate.artisoft.com
Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:10705 comp.unix.advocacy:12330
msmeissn@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Marcus Meissner) wrote:
[ ... SMP scalability ... ]
] 100% scaleable? Wasn't that mentioned under 'impossible' in
] the OS concepts lectures I've heard?
I heard you could get it using immutexes (a type of
asynchronization primitive).
8-) 8-).
Terry Lambert
terry@cs.weber.edu
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.