*BSD News Article 57214


Return to BSD News archive

#! rnews 2529 bsd
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!nntp.coast.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!EU.net!Portugal.EU.net!news.rccn.net!newsfeed.sunet.se!news01.sunet.se!sunic!news99.sunet.se!news.funet.fi!news.csc.fi!nokia.fi!ntc.nokia.com!usenet
From: ptaipale@madonna.trs.ntc.nokia.com (Pekka J Taipale)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.admin,alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc
Subject: Re: a monthly FreeBSD magazine (and other *BSD's too)
Date: 18 Dec 1995 23:52:51 +0200
Organization: Nokia Telecommunications Oy, Access Systems
Lines: 22
Sender: ptaipale@madonna.trs.ntc.nokia.com
Message-ID: <1pka3unioc.fsf@madonna.trs.ntc.nokia.com>
References: <4ajc07$sb7@unix2.glink.net.hk> <4arhgi$f0c@felix.junction.net>
	<4as2e7$91r@cnn.Princeton.EDU> <4asrpo$85k@agate.berkeley.edu>
	<4atie8$hsv@agate.berkeley.edu>
Reply-To: Pekka.Taipale@ntc.nokia.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: madonna.trs.ntc.nokia.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-reply-to: jkh@violet.berkeley.edu's message of 16 Dec 1995 04:37:28 GMT
X-Disclaimer: I speak for myself, not Nokia Telecommunications Oy
X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.1
Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.admin:36175 alt.os.linux:6516 comp.os.linux.advocacy:30757 comp.os.linux.misc:76298 comp.os.linux.setup:32862 comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:10738 comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc:1599


Aw please, quit this thread. At least get technical and discuss the
real differences of Linux and FreeBSD. There's no point in having Linux
and FreeBSD advocates fight each other. Both should concentrate on
bashing Microsoft, who really deserves it.

I'm sure Linux and FreeBSD are about equally great systems. Their
differences lie in the way their designers work. Linux is anarchistic,
FreeBSD is centralistic. Fine, both are valid approaches and fill out
different gaps.

I have no real experience of FreeBSD except as an ISP customer - the
ISP uses both Linux and FreeBSD: Linux for drivers, FreeBSD for
reputation of stable network code. Linux and FreeBSD benefit from each
other, they share technical development work. So please be polite
to each other. I use Linux as my primary working platform, and it
works so great that I see no point in converting to FreeBSD, but I'm
sure that if there was need, FreeBSD would serve me at least equally
well. (Perhaps excluding DOSEMU).

-- 
Pekka.Taipale@ntc.nokia.com