*BSD News Article 58034


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!nntp.coast.net!lll-winken.llnl.gov!uwm.edu!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!newsrelay.iastate.edu!news.iastate.edu!popeye.cs.iastate.edu!mhartong
From: Mark Hartong <mhartong@cs.iastate.edu>
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: Good Job Team FREEBSD
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 1995 22:28:48 -0600
Organization: Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa
Lines: 67
Message-ID: <Pine.HPP.3.91.951223215325.406A-100000@popeye.cs.iastate.edu>
References: <199512230326.WAA07899@sibelius.helios.nd.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: popeye.cs.iastate.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
In-Reply-To: <199512230326.WAA07899@sibelius.helios.nd.edu>

John,

I am running a 48DX/66 Clone, using a Cyrix 486 SLC Chip with AMI Bios,
8 MB Ram, 128k secondary cache, 
a Mitsummi Double Speed CD ROM, a Colorado 120MB Tape Back up, 
a Conner 420 MB Hard Drive,  a NE 2000 Ethernet Clone Card,
a Zomm 14.4 Fax Modemwith a 14 inch monitor.   

The entire system is dedicated to Unix, with X Windows running ctwm-  
I used the default settings on the 
2.1 installation disk to get up and running, and then did a custom kernel.

Which is better?   Each has it's advantages and disadvantages. 
It depends on what you are looking for.  Linux DOES have a wider user base, so
you might be more likely to run across someone who is using Linux.  However
remeber that a wider user base doesn't necessarily mean "better".  Just
look at Micro$oft.

As a professional software engineer, I feel more comfortable with the 
FreeBSD core team approach.   I think that they have a better handle on
configuration control.  For me, this is extremely valuable, I have other things
that I want to do than to troubleshoot "why XYZ doesn't work" when a revison t
to XYZ comes out.  (Not that I don't like hacking mind you.... but  
the day to day existance of a grad student kind of puts a BIG crimp on
fun things  :))

WRT to the issue of documentation,  I have managed VERY well with the BSD4.4
reference manuals (available from O'Reily), a copy of Essential Systems
Administration (also from O'Reily),  DNS and Bind (also from O'Reily),
TCP/IP Network Administration (O'Reily Again), and Sendmail (O'Reily again).
Those, coupled with a little common sense and  the documenation
that the FreeBSD team has put together, are more than adequate.  


I have  also run Linux. It is a good system, but IMHO not quite up to the BSD
Unix.  When you think about it, CSRG at Berkley has been working on Unix 
for over 15 years now... 15 years is a lot of " accumulated knowledge" that
shows in some of the details.

Hope this helps... I've got to get back to grading papers

Regds

Mark

to 
On Fri, 22 Dec 1995, john tran wrote:
> 
> Mark, if you do not mind, can you please tell me your hardware configuration?
> I am deciding between linux and bsd.  I have installed both -- but unsure
> which is better.
>   EMAIL  John.Tran@ND.EDU
>     URL  http://www.nd.edu/~jtran/
> 

****************************************************************************
Mark Hartong                                see also  HARTONG@netins.net    
mhartong@cs.iastate.edu                               hartongm@detrick.disa.mil
http://www.cs.iastate.edu/~hartong/homepage.html      hartongm@dsainc.com 

Old Engineer, Older Comp Sci Grad Student-

" Let me get this right........
You're giving up your job, seniority, and pension to go do 
what????????   Are you out of your mind?"
****************************************************************************