*BSD News Article 58372


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.rmit.EDU.AU!news.unimelb.EDU.AU!munnari.OZ.AU!spool.mu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.mathworks.com!fu-berlin.de!zrz.TU-Berlin.DE!zib-berlin.de!news.tu-chemnitz.de!irz401!uriah.heep!news
From: j@uriah.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: 2.0.5 problem- process table too small (odd circumstances)
Date: 28 Dec 1995 11:15:00 GMT
Organization: Private BSD site, Dresden
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <4btu7k$5jv@uriah.heep.sax.de>
References: <bogawa.820138847@digital>
Reply-To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch)
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.heep.sax.de
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Newsreader: knews 0.9.3

bogawa@digital.netvoyage.net (Bryan Ogawa at Work) writes:

> This works, I can boot, I can get networks (in fact, I'm typing this in on
> an xterm telnetted from that machine as I write), but I'm limited to 42
> (or thereabout) processes (which is annoying since I'm trying to screen my
> way through all 64 possibilities).

This is the default per-user process limit.  You need to bump it only
in rare occasions (e.g. for an X11 user).  Ideally, it should not be
modified in the kernel (though this is possible), but whereever it is
appropriate, for example from the ~/.xsession.  Unfortunately, csh did
have a `limit' command for rather long, but /bin/sh's ulimit
counterpart has been added after 2.1R.

RTFM csh(1), getrlimit(2)/setrlimit(2).

-- 
cheers, J"org

joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)