Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!nntp.coast.net!howland.reston.ans.net!blackbush.xlink.net!zib-berlin.de!news.tu-chemnitz.de!irz401!uriah.heep!news From: j@uriah.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Subject: Re: FreeBSD Boot Manager on OS/2 Dual Boot System? Date: 30 Dec 1995 20:50:17 GMT Organization: Private BSD site, Dresden Lines: 18 Message-ID: <4c48m9$f8v@uriah.heep.sax.de> References: <4c128e$5hh@news1.cle.ab.com> <4c20ij$b4r@uriah.heep.sax.de> <DKEpz1.36q@linus.demon.co.uk> Reply-To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch) NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.heep.sax.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Newsreader: knews 0.9.3 Mark Valentine <mark@linus.demon.co.uk> writes: > >Choose ``Let my MBR alone'' in the installation menu. > > Are you confusing Dual Boot with the Boot Manager, or am I? :-\ The boot manager is installed to the Master Boot record. Well, of course, you could still install it, but it doesn't make any sense. (At least, i think that OS/2's boot manager is able to boot foreign partitions, so why not use _it_ instead of booteasy to select your system to boot?) -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)