Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.mel.connect.com.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!news.cis.okstate.edu!col.hp.com!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!news.mathworks.com!fu-berlin.de!zib-berlin.de!news.tu-chemnitz.de!irz401!uriah.heep!news From: j@uriah.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Subject: Re: Please - Spoil the Ending! Date: 31 Dec 1995 14:34:02 GMT Organization: Private BSD site, Dresden Lines: 22 Message-ID: <4c670q$s31@uriah.heep.sax.de> References: <4c57h6$c34@gol2.gol.com> Reply-To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch) NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.heep.sax.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Newsreader: knews 0.9.3 Doug Lerner <doug@gol.com> writes: > My question, simply put, is can I handle both domain names easily out of > the one FreeBSD box? Of course. From BIND's view, two domain names are simply two DNS zones, so all you need is two zone files (plus a third one for the reverse mapping). > Do I need to split my Class C in two parts? Is there any reason why one > network can't have two domain names with different IP addresses > belonging to different domain names arbitrarily? Is there any problem > with both domain names using the same gateway router? There is no reason for this (at least, no technical). -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)