Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!manuel!munnari.oz.au!spool.mu.edu!darwin.sura.net!haven.umd.edu!uunet!netwrk!rt From: rt@MAGEC.COM (49) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd Subject: Re: Catch What They're Saying About Us... Message-ID: <121@netwrk.UUCP> Date: 1 Oct 92 14:41:34 GMT References: <VIXIE.92Sep23102423@cognition.pa.dec.com> <1992Sep29.132808.29177@prism.poly.edu> Organization: MAGNAVOX Electronics Systems Co., Fort Wayne Lines: 20 In article <1992Sep29.132808.29177@prism.poly.edu>, kapela@prism.poly.edu (Theodore S. Kapela) writes: > In article <1992Sep25.021813.2369@kithrup.COM> sef@kithrup.COM (Sean Eric Fagan) writes: > >BSDi is actually benefited, to some degree, by 386BSD. BSD/386 is stabler, > >better supported, and commercial (and proprietary; one need not follow from > > Better supported? A few techies compared to thousands of readers of this > newsgroup? And what happens if BSDI goes out of business? > I could not disagree more. While there may be fewer 'techies' supporting BSD/386 the signal to noise ratio is much higher. As to BSDi going out of business, the most likely cause of that happening is a loss to the death star (tm). In that case, IMHO, we are all 'out of business'. -- Al Marshall rt@magec.com Standard Disclaimer... netwrk!rt