Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.mel.connect.com.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!paladin.american.edu!gatech!newsfeed.internetmci.com!solaris.cc.vt.edu!news.seanet.com!news.seanet.com!michaelv
From: michaelv@MindBender.HeadCandy.com (Michael L. VanLoon)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.misc
Subject: Re: SCO rebellion?
Date: 15 Jan 1996 05:33:32 GMT
Organization: HeadCandy Associates... Sweets for the lobes.
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <MICHAELV.96Jan14213332@MindBender.HeadCandy.com>
References: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960108203155.19152A-100000@world.evansville.net>
<4cuat5$lj5@zuul.nmti.com> <30F9DA79.4357@sooner.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: mindbender.seanet.com
In-reply-to: Rusty Weaver's message of Sun, 14 Jan 1996 20:39:21 -0800
In article <30F9DA79.4357@sooner.net> Rusty Weaver <rusty@sooner.net> writes:
I'm running BSDI. I've used SCO in the past and I still prefer it even
though BSD has all the bell and whistles. BSD is just too slow. SCO has
had a long time to optimize their code and have done a pretty good job of
it. On the other hand, Altos has a version of SCO which is supposed to
be 200 times faster than regular SCO. That's got to be 1000 times faster
than BSD. SCO is soon to release a 64 bit version. . . it should scream!
Funny. My experience was exactly the opposite.
(NetBSD vs. SCO)
--
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Michael L. VanLoon michaelv@HeadCandy.com
--< Free your mind and your machine -- NetBSD free un*x >--
NetBSD working ports: 386+PC, Mac 68k, Amiga, HP300, Sun3, Sun4,
DEC PMAX (MIPS), DEC Alpha, PC532
NetBSD ports in progress: VAX, Atari 68k, others...
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -