*BSD News Article 59274


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.rmit.EDU.AU!news.unimelb.EDU.AU!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!paladin.american.edu!gatech!news.mathworks.com!solaris.cc.vt.edu!news.seanet.com!news.seanet.com!michaelv
From: michaelv@MindBender.HeadCandy.com (Michael L. VanLoon)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd.bsdi.misc,comp.unix.solaris,comp.unix.aix
Subject: Re: ISP hardware/software choices (performance comparison)
Date: 10 Jan 1996 06:18:27 GMT
Organization: HeadCandy Associates... Sweets for the lobes.
Lines: 39
Distribution: inet
Message-ID: <MICHAELV.96Jan9221827@MindBender.HeadCandy.com>
References: <4cmopu$d35@vixen.cso.uiuc.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: mindbender.seanet.com
In-reply-to: mstary@prairienet.org's message of 6 Jan 1996 21:15:42 GMT
Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc:1878 comp.unix.bsd.bsdi.misc:2022 comp.unix.solaris:56826 comp.unix.aix:68371

In article <4cmopu$d35@vixen.cso.uiuc.edu> mstary@prairienet.org (stary) writes:

   I have a dilemma about the hardware that I should use for my ISP/WWW
   site (www, ftp, ppp/slip, news, pop....).  After some research and
   after reading the Inet-access FAQ a couple of times, I get very
   contradicting evidence on what h/w I should use.  I have considered and
   analyzed three different platforms (from a raw CPU performance point of
   view):
   (1) Sun-SunOS, Solaris, 
   (2) IBM PPCs - AIX, Solaris ppc
   (3) Pentium P5/P6 - BSD (I, net), x86 Solaris
[tons of data deleted...]

I'm not going to quote any hard numbers, but am just going to say that
you won't be disappointed with a high-end PC (P5/P6) with a BSD on it.
The performance is very good, and is excellent for the money spent.

An Intel chip will never touch a top-end Alpha, but that's not the
hardware we're talking about.  And, we're also not talking about
non-stop floating point number crunching (something else RISC chips
generally excel at).  For general use a 133MHz Pentium, or something
faster, is going to be untouchable in the same cost class.

Personally, I'd recommend NetBSD, just because I'm biased.  But the
FreeBSD guys also have a good story to tell with respect to
ftp.cdrom.com, one of the busiest servers on the Internet, which is a
Pentium running FreeBSD.

Anyway, I'm sure you'll get lots of other advice, much of it
conflicting.  Consider this my somewhat-educated input.

--
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
  Michael L. VanLoon                                 michaelv@HeadCandy.com
       --<  Free your mind and your machine -- NetBSD free un*x  >--
     NetBSD working ports: 386+PC, Mac 68k, Amiga, HP300, Sun3, Sun4,
                           DEC PMAX (MIPS), DEC Alpha, PC532
     NetBSD ports in progress: VAX, Atari 68k, others...
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -