*BSD News Article 59583


Return to BSD News archive

Newsgroups: alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.asus,comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!nntp.coast.net!news.kei.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.sprintlink.net!dfw.nkn.net!rowdy.lonestar.org!nemesis!madsoft!mike
From: mike@madsoft.lonestar.org (Mike)
Subject: Re: Triton vs. SiS Pentium chipsets
X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL5
Organization: Mikes place
Message-ID: <DLGoEE.1p9@madsoft.lonestar.org>
References: <MICHAELV.96Jan15233000@MindBender.HeadCandy.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 1996 03:59:02 GMT
Lines: 14
Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.asus:8733 comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:12501 comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc:1946

Michael L. VanLoon (michaelv@MindBender.HeadCandy.com) wrote:
>What exactly are the differences between the Triton and SiS
>Pentium-class chipsets?  Does the SiS have any disadvantages versus
>the Triton?  Does the SiS demand special hardware (cache, RAM, etc.)
>that the Triton doesn't?  Which performs better?

Get the January 8th (or the following week) copy of Infoworld and
find the comparison of five or six 133MHz Pentium systems.  All but
one had about the same performance.  The fast one were Tritons and the
slow one was based on SIS.   The chipset is probably not the sole
cause of lower performance, but it is critical to good performance.

						mike