Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.mel.connect.com.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.hawaii.edu!ames!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!gatech!news.mathworks.com!fu-berlin.de!news.dfn.de!RRZ.Uni-Koeln.DE!zpr.uni-koeln.de!se From: se@ZPR.Uni-Koeln.DE (Stefan Esser) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.misc Subject: Re: SCO rebellion? Date: 15 Jan 1996 16:33:39 GMT Organization: Institute for Mathematics, University of Cologne, Germany Lines: 23 Sender: se@Sysiphos (Stefan Esser) Message-ID: <4ddvl3$e3@news.rrz.uni-koeln.de> References: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960108203155.19152A-100000@world.evansville.net> <4cuat5$lj5@zuul.nmti.com> <30F9DA79.4357@sooner.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: sysiphos.mi.uni-koeln.de In article <30F9DA79.4357@sooner.net>, Rusty Weaver <rusty@sooner.net> writes: |> I'm running BSDI. I've used SCO in the past and I still prefer it even |> though BSD has all the bell and whistles. BSD is just too slow. SCO has |> had a long time to optimize their code and have done a pretty good job of |> it. On the other hand, Altos has a version of SCO which is supposed to |> be 200 times faster than regular SCO. That's got to be 1000 times faster 200 times faster ??? |> than BSD. SCO is soon to release a 64 bit version. . . it should scream! 64 bit ... for which CPU ? You didn't succeed in making me believe that you have the slightest idea what you are talking about ... -- Stefan Esser, Zentrum fuer Paralleles Rechnen Tel: +49 221 4706021 Universitaet zu Koeln, Weyertal 80, 50931 Koeln FAX: +49 221 4705160 ============================================================================== http://www.zpr.uni-koeln.de/~se <se@ZPR.Uni-Koeln.DE>