Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.bhp.com.au!mel.dit.csiro.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!paladin.american.edu!europa.chnt.gtegsc.com!gatech!newsxfer2.itd.umich.edu!agate!reason.cdrom.com!usenet From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@FreeBSD.org> Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Subject: Re: Does FreeBSD 2.1 Support EDI CDROM? Date: Tue, 16 Jan 1996 04:49:40 -0800 Organization: Walnut Creek CDROM Lines: 9 Message-ID: <30FB9EE4.13728473@FreeBSD.org> References: <4d9dc8$cl9@mercury.IntNet.net> <4ddbdb$725@news1.halcyon.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: time.cdrom.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0b5 (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.1-STABLE i386) To: Tim Smith <tzs@coho.halcyon.com> Tim Smith wrote: > Is there any fundamental reason for IDE devices to not be more dynamically > configurable, like SCSI devices, or is it just that IDE support for non-disks > is newer in FreeBSD, so it is just not as mature as the SCSI support? Bingo. -- - Jordan Hubbard President, FreeBSD Project