Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.bhp.com.au!mel.dit.csiro.au!munnari.OZ.AU!spool.mu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!agate!reason.cdrom.com!usenet From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@FreeBSD.org> Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd.misc Subject: Re: BSDI vs FreeBSD Date: Sat, 10 Feb 1996 17:41:58 -0800 Organization: Walnut Creek CDROM Lines: 11 Message-ID: <311D4966.41C67EA6@FreeBSD.org> References: <AFj4X5nCg4@qsar.chem.msu.su> <4f6eir$odk@news.quanta.com> <4f86tp$5ki@atlas.uniserve.com> <4fgqa5$epv@lestat.nas.nasa.gov> NNTP-Posting-Host: time.cdrom.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.1-STABLE i386) To: Jason R Thorpe <thorpej@lestat.nas.nasa.gov> Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:13560 comp.unix.bsd.misc:497 Jason R Thorpe wrote: > Heh ... that's not what my BSD/OS 2.1 box says :-) I guess I could have > read it wrong, but I'm pretty certain they include Matt Thomas's DEC > ethernet and FDDI drivers as well as the Adaptec 2940. I can certainly believe the FDDI driver, but the 2940? Are you SURE? I rememeber quite a few BSDI folks saying that they'd support Adaptec when a certain very hot place grew very cold! :-) -- - Jordan Hubbard President, FreeBSD Project