Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au!munnari.OZ.AU!spool.mu.edu!news.sol.net!news.inc.net!news.uoregon.edu!hpg30a.csc.cuhk.hk!news.cuhk.edu.hk!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!uwm.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!csn!ub!newsstand.cit.cornell.edu!news.tc.cornell.edu!newsserver.sdsc.edu!acsc.com!kaiwan.kaiwan.com!pell.pell.chi.il.us!there.is.no.cabal
From: orc@pell.chi.il.us (Orc)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: The better (more suitable)Unix?? FreeBSD or Linux
Date: 7 Feb 1996 00:56:58 -0800
Organization: Lust corrodes my body
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <4f9pgq$jkd@pell.pell.chi.il.us>
References: <4er9hp$5ng@orb.direct.ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pell.pell.chi.il.us
In article <4er9hp$5ng@orb.direct.ca>, John Moore <moorej@direct.ca> wrote:
>This is a question for those that have tried both. Or know of someone
>who has.
.
.
.
>Now the problem. All the reading that I've done on the subject seems
>to indicate that while Linux supports more varied types of hardware,
>FreeBSD is a more stable product.
>
>Comments anyone ???
Find out which version has more experts using it locally, then
use that version. If you want to go it alone, flip a coin; you'll
certainly find that both of 'em are equally suitable for the job.
____
david parsons \bi/ orc@pell.com^H^Hhi.il.us
\/