Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.bhp.com.au!mel.dit.csiro.au!munnari.OZ.AU!uunet!in1.uu.net!world!coopnews.coop.net!hops.entertain.com!usenet From: dwatson@abwam.com (Darryl Watson) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.bsdi.misc Subject: Re: portmaster Date: 24 Feb 1996 16:43:46 GMT Organization: ABWAM, Inc. Lines: 16 Message-ID: <4gnf82$ehu@hops.entertain.com> References: <4gg1be$5np@moon.igcom.net> <Pine.BSD/.3.91.960222100911.15410A-100000@server.esva.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp010.entertain.com X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.92.5 In article <Pine.BSD/.3.91.960222100911.15410A-100000@server.esva.net>, Thom Henderson <thom@esva.net> says: > >On 21 Feb 1996, David B. Bauman wrote: > >> I have noticed over the past year or so, a lot of people talking about >> terminal server, and particulary the livingston portmaster in general. >> I just want to say, these servers are crap. Not only do they not support > >Oh, I don't know. I'm very happy with ours. I suppose if you're the >sort of person who has trouble figuring out the docs, or who needs >intensive hand-holding with a new piece of equipment, your mileage may vary. I have to say our Portmaster, with ISDN support, makes it very easy to keep things running smoothly. In fact, I really wished that this kind of solution was available at today's prices, back when I started up my ISP business, over three years ago!