*BSD News Article 62240


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!nntp.coast.net!chi-news.cic.net!newsxfer2.itd.umich.edu!gatech!swrinde!howland.reston.ans.net!math.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!csn!ub!newsstand.cit.cornell.edu!news.tc.cornell.edu!newsserver.sdsc.edu!acsc.com!kaiwan.kaiwan.com!pell.pell.chi.il.us!there.is.no.cabal
From: orc@pell.chi.il.us (Orc)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc,comp.os.linux.development.system
Subject: Re: async or sync metadata [was:  FreeBSD v. Linux]
Date: 14 Feb 1996 18:45:25 -0800
Organization: By the Holy Claws of Klortho the Magnificent, this IS a fine morning!
Lines: 23
Message-ID: <4fu6o5$1uk@pell.pell.chi.il.us>
References: <4er9hp$5ng@orb.direct.ca> <4fi6gq$3tr@dyson.iquest.net> <4fjodc$o8j@venger.snds.com> <4fopq4$ahl@park.uvsc.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pell.pell.chi.il.us
Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:14423 comp.os.linux.development.system:18095

In article <4fopq4$ahl@park.uvsc.edu>,
Terry Lambert  <terry@lambert.org> wrote:
>grif@hill.ucr.edu (Michael Griffith) wrote:
>] Very hard indeed.  Here it is one more time:
>] 
>] 	sync metadata with async data is not just slower,
>] 	it is LESS SAFE.  This behavour should not be the default
>] 	on any reasonable system.  If you want real safety,
>] 	then both data and meta need to be synchronous (i.e. no
>] 	buffer cache for writes).  This real safety comes with
>] 	an huge performance hit (as in MSDOS).
>
>You don't know what you are talking about.  I have referenced
>both papers and mathematical models for file system recovery
>to refute this specious claim.  The only thing I have seen from
>the opposition is bind assertion.  Blind assertion is not proof.

   Can you cite a paper or two, please, so we can contact the
authors or their sponsoring organizations to get a copy?

               ____
 david parsons \bi/ Ce n'est pas bizarre.  Visitez le volcan, si vous plait.
                \/