Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!newshost.telstra.net!act.news.telstra.net!psgrain!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.mathworks.com!uunet!in2.uu.net!news.va.pubnix.com!not-for-mail From: hsu@va.pubnix.com (Dave Hsu) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.bsdi.misc Subject: Re: Gravis Ultrasound and BSDI 2.1? Date: 4 Mar 1996 15:29:23 -0500 Organization: AlterNet -- Falls Church, Virginia, USA Lines: 17 Message-ID: <4hfjr3$73h@arquebus.va.pubnix.com> References: <x7ivgrpfle.fsf@hoopoe.psc.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: arquebus.va.pubnix.com In article <x7ivgrpfle.fsf@hoopoe.psc.edu>, Peter Berger <peterb@hoopoe.psc.edu> wrote: >Has anyone successfully used a Gravis Ultrasound or Ultrasound Max with BSDI 2.1? While we're on this, is it just my imagination or does gus.h define the wrong symbol when you try to build a kernel with Gravis support? i386/isa/sound/soundcard.c really wants to see NGSUPP defined instead of NGUS. Not that I have a Gravis yet to test with, mind you. -dave -- Dave Hsu <hsu@va.pubnix.com> Systems Programmer Std disclaimers apply Software Development Group / UUNET Technologies http://www.va.pubnix.com "Remember, grief is conserved, and you've saved up a lot" - Mike O'Dell