*BSD News Article 62877


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!newshost.telstra.net!act.news.telstra.net!psgrain!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.mathworks.com!uunet!in2.uu.net!news.va.pubnix.com!not-for-mail
From: hsu@va.pubnix.com (Dave Hsu)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.bsdi.misc
Subject: Re: Gravis Ultrasound and BSDI 2.1?
Date: 4 Mar 1996 15:29:23 -0500
Organization: AlterNet -- Falls Church, Virginia, USA
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <4hfjr3$73h@arquebus.va.pubnix.com>
References: <x7ivgrpfle.fsf@hoopoe.psc.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: arquebus.va.pubnix.com

In article <x7ivgrpfle.fsf@hoopoe.psc.edu>,
Peter Berger <peterb@hoopoe.psc.edu> wrote:
>Has anyone successfully used a Gravis Ultrasound or Ultrasound Max with BSDI 2.1?

While we're on this, is it just my imagination or does gus.h define
the wrong symbol when you try to build a kernel with Gravis support?
i386/isa/sound/soundcard.c really wants to see NGSUPP defined instead
of NGUS.

Not that I have a Gravis yet to test with, mind you.

-dave

-- 
Dave Hsu  <hsu@va.pubnix.com>   Systems Programmer   Std disclaimers apply
Software Development Group / UUNET Technologies   http://www.va.pubnix.com
 "Remember, grief is conserved, and you've saved up a lot"  - Mike O'Dell